June 2012
With the recent completion of two megatall telecommunication/observation towers – Canton Tower in 2010 and Tokyo Sky Tree earlier this year – it is an appropriate time to review these structures and explain why they are distinguished from buildings in the Council’s official tallest lists.
To be considered a “building” a project must achieve three milestones: 1) it must be complete, 2) it must be freestanding and, 3) at least 50 percent of its height must be occubiable space. While projects like Canton Tower and Tokyo Sky Tree are indeed complete, free standing and partially occupiable – making them distinct from many of the world’s other telecommunication structures – less than 50 percent of their height is occupiable and thus the projects cannot be considered “buildings.” The following is a study of the world's “supertall” (300m+) occupiable telecommunication & observation towers (referred to as “occupiable T&O towers” in the study) – some 36 of which now exist in 23 countries around the globe.
This article was originally featured in the CTBUH Journal 2012 Issue II and is also available as a PDF download (download the Tall Buildings in Numbers article).